In my comment, I focus on Gregory Moss’ thesis that Hegel’s Concept is self-particularizing and, thereby, existentially implicating. While I am extremely sympathetic with this reading, I will raise two worries. The first one concerns Moss’ identification of the Concept’s self-particularization with self-instantiation, which I believe is too austere to satisfy the need for the Concept to produce its own existence as Absolute. By reconstructing Hegel’s discussion of essence as absolute negativity and reflection, I will suggest that Hegel presented an understanding of the Absolute as self-differing, rather than as self-instantiating, or self-repeating. My second worry concerns Moss’ identification of absolute existence with absolute knowledge, the latter being the knowledge produced by philosophy. I argue that this identification makes the Absolute finite. Thus, I conclude that Moss’ «total realism» needs to be mended with what I call ‘mystical modesty’.
TOTAL REALISM WITH MYSTICAL MODESTY: A COMMENT ON GREGORY MOSS’ ‘HEGEL’S FOUNDATIONS FREE METAPHYSICS’
Abstract
Download
16. Tripaldi (315-333).pdf
(213.21 KB)
Tripaldi E. (2025) "TOTAL REALISM WITH MYSTICAL MODESTY: A COMMENT ON GREGORY MOSS’ ‘HEGEL’S FOUNDATIONS FREE METAPHYSICS’
", Verifiche, 54(2), 315-333. DOI: 10.25430/pupj-VERIFICHE-2025-2-16
Year of Publication
2025
Journal
Verifiche
Volume
54
Issue Number
2
Start Page
315
Last Page
333
Date Published
12/2025
ISSN Number
0391-4186
Serial Article Number
16
DOI
10.25430/pupj-VERIFICHE-2025-2-16
Section
Special Section